clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:


Over on Slate, Tim De Chant has some harsh words for architects who "make a skyscraper look trendy and sustainable" by putting trees on buildings: "There are plenty of scientific reasons why skyscrapers don't—and probably won't—have trees [...]. Life sucks up there. [...] Life for city trees is hard enough on the ground. I can't imagine what it's like at 500 feet [...]." [Slate; previously]